The Polemics of Visual Thinking:

Scientific Imagery

In the Asmat culture of New Guinea, God is represented as a carver who created people from wooden statues. This myth dominates the culture, to such an extent that all rites of passage, marriage, death rituals, birth rituals, and all acts of war depend upon the sculptures the village carver creates for these various rites. The sculptures are sanctified and used by the other most promintent figure in the traditional village - the medicine man. The simultaneous struggle, and interdependance, of the carver and the medicine man, as personifications of art and science, serve as a useful (if somewhat optimistic) metaphor for the tentative balance between art and science in our own culture. If this metaphor is extended to include the more general concepts of visual and linguistic cognitive modes, along with art and science - the balance that exists in our educational systems, in particular, becomes disturbing.

Science is unquestionably favoured over art, since it ostensibly has a much more practical social impact. It is not simply the greater importance given to the sciences, but a dismissal of the arts, at the level that images are used freely, and apparently with little thought for the greater significance they might be imparting. As Thagard says in Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Psychology, " . . [M]ental imagery is useful in problem solving, [and] education may profitably involve teaching people to use images more effectively. . .Most psychological work on imagery, however, has been concerned with how people use images, not with educating them to use images better." (Thagard,1996)

This prefernce is reflected in the structure of our education. The misguided dichotomy of science versus the arts is truly ridiculous when considering how many major breakthroughs in modern science have been accomplished through the use of visualizing a solution. As Albert Einstein stated in 1945:

"The words of the language, as they are written or spoken, do not seem to play any role in my mechanisms of thought. The physical entities which seem to serve as elemnts in thought are certain signs and more or less clear images which can be voluntarily reproduced or combined." (Einstein, p.142)

Not only the Patriarch of Physics, but many others, including the Patriarch of Evolution, Mr. Charles Darwin, and countless others, from molecular biologists to chemists, have relied on the visual, particularly visual mental imagery and dialogue, to aid in the solutions to their problem-solving. " . . .[A] reliance on verbal concepts alone may lead the scientist to a certain rigidity of thought which can interfere with the discovery process." (John-Steiner: p.86)

The nescessity to scientists of what Howard E. Gruber characterizes as wide scope images can be traced to their multiple functions: " . . .the scientist needs them in order to comprehend what is known and to guide the search for what is not yet known." (Gruber:p.137)