The Polemics of Visual Thinking:

Eye and I:Creative Intelligence and perceptual Optics 2

William James once compared the stream of conscioussness to a bird's life:

"As we take, in fact, a general view of the wonderful stream of conscioussness, what strikes us first is this different pace of its parts. Like a bird's life, it seems to be made of an alternation of flights and perchings." (James: 203)

These flights and perchings serve as a powerful metaphor not only for a stream of consciousness, but of film - as a cinema of the subconscious with a collapsing of time, memory and image.

As John-Steiner states: ". . .[M]any intriguing parallels exist between the manifold itineraries of the human mind at work and the ways in which images, memories, associations, and stories are combined on celluloid" (John-Steiner: p.102). Many have noted the bizarre semblance of sunconscoussness captured on film, including the infamous Luis Bunuel, who once stated: "The screen is a dangerous and wonderful instrument . . .It is the superior way of expressing the world of dreams, emotions and instincts. . . The cinema seems to have been invented for the expression of the subconscious . . ." (Arando: p.274) Nowhere is the link between interior monlogue and external visualization clearer than in Henry Jaglom's statement that: " . . .[I]f I could grasp what is going on in my brain sucessfully, I could do it by putting it up on screen." (John-Steiner: p.104)

The cinema is a powerful tool for shaping, and expressing the inner visual dialogues between memory, imagination, and subconsciousness. Cinema is also a powerful shaper of the vision society holds of itself - particularly on the young people in theprocess of building their own identity. Films are also notorious for the irresponsible and unthinking use of imagery, a bombardment of images without an underlying concept other than to engage the individual in the experiential mode. However, it is also unique in that it uses a relatively conventionalized visual grammar to represent internal and external realities, and in this it may be a useful tool in explicating the interdependance of image and language.

A metaphor of flights and perchings applies not only to a cinema of the subconscious, but also to the users course through the web. Though many educational programs already incorporate some sort of media-analysis in some disipline or other, these will prove inadequate as television and the web begin to fuse - with URLs showing up in movie trailers, and web surfing becoming more and more like clicking TV channels - an ability to decode the visual will become an increasingly important part of every individual's basic education. Turning a blind eye to the impact of visual imput will not solve the problem. Only an intensive training in imagery decoding, and creating, will give each generation the tools to fully understand and be affective, not simply affected, in their culture.